Jump to content

Our forum made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ads blocker.

  • Announcements

    • EmperoR

      Dear Guests   12/24/2016

      Welcome to the GIS-AREA. like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of GIS-AREA by signing in or creating an account here. Once you have created your account and have introduced yourself to our community, you can start new topics, reply to others, subscribe interesting threads, get your customize profiles, make news friends, and others nice stuff. To make your stay as pleasant and constructive as possible, please don't forget to read through our pinned forum rules and board guidelines in each section before you do anything else.
Sign in to follow this  
adel.naseri

Why my result of flaash useing aster data is incorrect?

Recommended Posts

adel.naseri    0

the right image is corrected image and the left on is the original image.

in this three pictures i compared the spectral profiles of two images in Three different locations.

jp3b_1.jpg

 

38x6_2.jpg

ue7r_3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
peralta2794    1

1. evidentemente las firmas espectral de ND y reflectancia (FLAASH) deben ser diferentes.

2.Factor de escala es 10.

3.Coloca la firma espectral de la vegetacion y comparalo con el teorico.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
adel.naseri    0

thanks "peralta2794"...

1.I do not think that the differences in spectral profiles of one location in both images is evident. it is possible they have Small differences But not like this Big differences.

2.The scale factor is 10.

3.The area covered by my image is desert therefore doesn't have vegetation or water bodies.

 

 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
achoknyz    9

Dear Cadet,

 

As FLAASH module multiplies the output (surface reflectance data) by 10,000 omitting decimals for faster calculations and lower file size, we should apply this equation:

 

(B1 le 0)*0+(B1 ge 10000)*1+(B1 gt 0 and B1 lt 10000)*float (b1)/10000

 

where;          

le  means less than or equal          

ge means greater than or equal          

gt  means greater than         

lt   means less than

 

The resulting surface reflectance data will lie between 0 to less than unity (0 to <1) suitable for further image spectrometry and comparable with most spectral libraries.

 

I hope that helps

 

Regards

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
am2    86

Dear Cadet,

 

As FLAASH module multiplies the output (surface reflectance data) by 10,000 omitting decimals for faster calculations and lower file size, we should apply this equation:

 

(B1 le 0)*0+(B1 ge 10000)*1+(B1 gt 0 and B1 lt 10000)*float (b1)/10000

 

where;          

le  means less than or equal          

ge means greater than or equal          

gt  means greater than         

lt   means less than

 

The resulting surface reflectance data will lie between 0 to less than unity (0 to <1) suitable for further image spectrometry and comparable with most spectral libraries.

 

I hope that helps

 

Regards

Yes..You have to scale your data using this eq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
achoknyz    9

Dear Adel.naseri,

 

You much welcome. Do you mind sharing your methodology for UHI retrieval using Aster data.

 

thank you

 

Regards

 Achoknyz 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
am2    86

Dear Adel.naseri,

 

You much welcome. Do you mind sharing your methodology for UHI retrieval using Aster data.

 

thank you

 

Regards

 Achoknyz 

Maybe he just use LST?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
peralta2794    1

Si existe vegetacion, la tonalidad roja es vegetacion, puedes poner el cursos en esa zona roja y mostrar su firma espectral, ademas no tiene logica (-20000, 30000) en out-ref... el rango de la reflectancia usando FLAASH es (0, 10000).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.