Jump to content

Our forum made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ads blocker.

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Last week
  3. mirfirdousa

  4. Beginner´s question

    Fernando você fala Português?
  5. sure, here you go Yannis_ar we wait your contribution here
  6. Mozilla Release Firefox Quantum

    nice news , happy for all that use firefox, regards
  7. I want to be active member (I need software of course) but the thing is that I prefer to read than to write answers. If I am not absolutely sure for something I prefer to stay silent
  8. Increase range of 433MHz remote sensor

    I think this kind of question better on electronic forum, something like this : http://www.sonsivri.to/forum/index.php but if anyone here has experience then , please answer
  9. Forum for ESRI ArcGIS

    did you mean here? there is no specific forum for one product, you can ask anykind of product here
  10. Is there a dedicated forum to discuss ArcGIS? I couldn't find and in the search.
  11. I have wireless weather station with 3 remote 433MHz sensors so I cannot change the protocol and program the controllers. Also I'm new to radio but have some basic understanding how it all works. I'm trying to modify the stock product to increase its capabilities, a sort of DIY project for home. The sensors and station base are mounted on concrete walls of my home, where maximum distance between base and sensor is about 15 meters (and crosses 3 walls). The Base is able to receive signals from all sensors except one that is the most distant. Link to the weather station on amazon. Transmitters TH71071EDC (datasheet: http://www.kynix.com/uploadfiles/pdf9675/TH71071EDC.pdf )run on 2 AAA batteries, 3V. What is the easiest way to allow it receive the signal? Attach better antenna to the transmitter? Or completely replace the transmitter module? I understand that I didn't provide much information about the circuits because I'm not sure if it matters in my case. I can post images of the inside later if needed. UPDATE Here is a receiver module of the station Base. The Sensor box is harder to open because it looks like sealed. I'll try to open it later and now hope the receiver can give some ideas.
  12. Mozilla Release Firefox Quantum

    yap, just toying around this new version, pretty impressive
  13. Beginner´s question

    With Image Classification toolbar it recognizes objects in images
  14. Myths and Misconceptions about remote sensing

    a lot of landuse / landcover mapping problems will be resolved if we are using visual interpretation. because combination of eye and brain just superb, and no tool can replace it yet
  15. Mozilla Release Firefox Quantum

    currently using firefox quantum, pretty nice, tabs are responsive, kind of fast, and so far doesnt consume a large amount of memory like chrome does
  16. Earlier
  17. 2x faster and 30 % less memory Mozilla today delivered a re-engineered Firefox, branded "Quantum," that it claims is twice as fast as just a few months earlier, and unveiled a re-drawn UI (user interface) with minimalist leanings. The browser maker also dumped Yahoo as Firefox's default search engine in the U.S., Canada and elsewhere, to return to Google, its partner - and primary financier - before a falling out three years ago. "It's by far the biggest update we've had since we launched Firefox 1.0 in 2004," Mark Mayo, the Mozilla executive who oversees the browser The new browser's official designation is Firefox 57, just another in an every-six-week series of upgrades. Until now, Mozilla has always numbered, never named, its browser releases. Firefox Quantum boasts a revamped rendering engine with a new CSS (cascading style sheets) layout engine. Along with other components, the engine was written in Rust, a programming language that originated in Mozilla's research group. The result: a significant speed increase. "Firefox Quantum is over twice as fast as Firefox from 6 months ago, built on a completely overhauled core engine with brand new technology stolen from our advanced research group," said Mayo, who credited the rendering engine's use of multiple processor cores for the boost. Other changes ran down the page and onto the next in Firefox's release notes, and included active tab prioritization and a switch-over from legacy add-ons to those built using the WebAssembly API (application programming interface). Quantum also sports a new UI, the first major redesign since 2011's Firefox 4. The UI and user experience (UX) changes, derived from an ongoing project tapped as "Photon," emphasize speed improvements, both real and simply perceived. The UI matches the streamlined austerity of rivals such as Google's Chrome and Microsoft's Edge. Firefox 57 combines the address and search bars - for new installations at least; existing users who miss the latter can restore it - reduces the clutter at the top of the window, and debuts a reworked new tab page. Almost lost among the visual and technological changes was a simultaneous announcement that after three years, Firefox is switching back to Google as the default search engine in the U.S., Canada, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Other markets remain with their previous defaults, including Yandex (in Russia and Belarus) and Baidu (People's Republic of China). "This is part of our ongoing search strategy, announced in 2014 to evaluate and select the best search experience in each region as opposed to having a single global default," asserted Denelle Dixon, Mozilla's chief legal officer, in a separate blog post. That was a remarkably terse explanation after the way Mozilla and Yahoo publicized their partnership in November 2014, when they signed a multi-million dollar deal that was to run five years. In 2015, for example, Yahoo paid Mozilla about $375 million, or approximately $100 million more than Google laid out in 2013, the last full year of its Firefox arrangement. What Dixon left unsaid was reported last year, when Recode and the New York Times claimed that the 2014 Yahoo-Mozilla contact gave Mozilla the right to switch to another search provider if Yahoo was sold. It was, to Verizon, which this summer completed a $4.5 billion acquisition of the former Internet giant. According to those news reports, Mozilla would still be due money, perhaps more than $1 billion although the amount was unclear, for the remaining two years of the contract. Mozilla's return to Google as the default in the U.S. and Canada - the same markets Yahoo had sewed up with its 2014 pact - implied that it had walked away from the latter search engine. The Quantum project, the Photon UI overhaul and last year's move to make Firefox a multiple-process browser have been crucial to Mozilla's recovery strategy. Firefox once accounted for a quarter of the world's user share, but dipped as low as 8% in the summer of 2016. Since then, it's scratched back to 13% as of October. But will Firefox's remodel be enough to cause its share to, say, overtake Microsoft's declining Internet Explorer/Edge combination (with a 19.7% share last month), or erode Chrome's dominance (59.8%)? "No. I just can't see it at this point," said Jack Gold, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. "The dominance of Google on Android, of Safari on iOS, Internet Explorer and Chrome on PCs, there's just not room for another browser. It would have to be so unique." And Firefox's Quantum upgrade isn't that, Gold argued. "I just don't see how they can come back. It's a futile effort." With virtually no relevance in mobile, even with Android and iOS versions of Firefox available, and failed campaigns to build its own mobile OS or transform that into an Internet-of-things (IoT) platform, Mozilla has little strategic wiggle room. "In a year from now, it will be the same all over again," Gold said, referring to Firefox's minor player status. DOWNLAOD : https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/
  18. Beginner´s question

    Dear Yousef My question actually is: Is it possible to ArcMap to recognize the object in a satellite image?
  19. Beginner´s question

    Dear fernandocjr, Check "Integrate" tool in FeatureClass toolset.
  20. 3dengine,104,ecp.arcgis.engine,01-jan-2025,IE812XLYE1B73R5LN151

  21. Beginner´s question

    Hello, I'm just starting in ArcMap and I'm trying to learn to work in a college project. So, I have more than 500k points in a map, these points must be placed in the same position of some cisterns, but, the database we have is not much accurate, in some cases the point is exactly in the cistern location, like in the image: Image Here Some times the point is placed near but not in the exactly location like in the next image: Image Here But, the problem is that some of them are placed in a place totally wrong, and cause are so many point we can´t check manually. The solution we are thinking is: To create a range of 500m for each point, and inside this range make ArcMap look for in the satellite images for the cisterns, and if it finds we will keep the point, if don´t we will disregard it. What I wanna ask is if this is possible in ArcMap or not. Thanks
  22. Latest Stable version of QGIS

    Good news thks, regards.
  23. Latest Stable version of QGIS

    Thanks Dear , I know there are answers on google but i want someone tested the program Best regards
  24. Latest Stable version of QGIS

    version 2.18.14 dont be lazy, google is your friend, pal.
  25. Hi, What is the latest stable version from QGIS? Thanks
  26. Myths and Misconceptions about remote sensing

    The links have changed over these years. Please consider this link.
  27. Nothing worked the way I wanted it to work so far I am still looking around... I will update my post when I reach a solution!
  28. Myths and Misconceptions about remote sensing

    Thank you very much. It's really a very good information. These texts are missing images which has been referred here.
  1. Load more activity

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.