Jump to content

Our forum made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ads blocker.

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'flaash'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • General
    • Feedback and Introduction
    • Off Topic
  • Geographic Information Science News and Discussions
    • General GIS Topic
    • GeoData
    • GeoHardware
    • WebGIS
    • Analysis and Geoprocessing
    • Cartography Design
    • Spatial Programming
    • Remote Sensing
    • Mobile GIS
    • Applied GIS
    • Jobs and Schedules
  • GIS Around The World
    • Language Specific Room

Marker Groups

  • Members
  • Contributor
  • Staff

Found 2 results

  1. Hi all, I am a research intern researching atmospheric correction for smoke, because a lot of the data AVIRIS has given me has smoke in them from wildfires in CA. My study has been using FLAASH and I am trying to see if I can find a set of parameters that best correct for smoke, and I am wondering if anyone here has any good suggestions for settings I should try. Also I have been noticing that overall FLAASH has been doing a really poor job at correcting for smoke in general, does anyone have a reason why or what part of the theory that makes up FLAASH could be failing at modeling smoke? I hope to try ATCOR too hopefully and do the same thing I'm doing for FLAASH. Thanks, Ben
  2. when i rectify spectral profile of my result image to original image, the curves is perfectly different.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.