Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'FLAASH'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • General
    • Feedback and Introduction
    • Off Topic
    • Geography
  • Geographic Information Science News and Discussions
    • General
    • GeoData
    • GeoHardware
    • WebGIS
    • Analysis and Geoprocessing
    • Cartography Design
    • Spatial Programming
    • Remote Sensing
    • Mobile GIS
    • Applied GIS
    • Jobs and Schedules
  • GIS Around The World
    • Language Specific Room
  • RS-GIS Sharing Area

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


MSN


Yahoo


AIM


ICQ


Jabber


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hi all, I am a research intern researching atmospheric correction for smoke, because a lot of the data AVIRIS has given me has smoke in them from wildfires in CA. My study has been using FLAASH and I am trying to see if I can find a set of parameters that best correct for smoke, and I am wondering if anyone here has any good suggestions for settings I should try. Also I have been noticing that overall FLAASH has been doing a really poor job at correcting for smoke in general, does anyone have a reason why or what part of the theory that makes up FLAASH could be failing at modeling smoke? I hope to try ATCOR too hopefully and do the same thing I'm doing for FLAASH. Thanks, Ben
  2. when i rectify spectral profile of my result image to original image, the curves is perfectly different.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Disable-Adblock.png

 

If you enjoy our contents, support us by Disable ads Blocker or add GIS-area to your ads blocker whitelist